|
NEWS May 6th 2004
|
||
|
BULLYING & BRIBERY - THE NEW OLYMPIC GAMES As London's bid to host the 2012 Olympics steams patriotically ahead, a Corporate Watch investigation has revealed that Ken Livingstone's London Development Agency (LDA) are threatening residents of the proposed Olympic site with Compulsory Purchase Orders if they do not agree to sell their homes and businesses, and relocate to make way for the developers. At a meeting held last November in Stratford Town Hall, Tony Winterbottom, one of the LDA's directors, confirmed that businesses would be 'encouraged to relocate', but that Compulsory Purchase Orders would be used if necessary. In fact, by his own admission, without the use of CPO's, the LDA would only have half of the land needed to site the Games. Residents of Hackney, Newham, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest, which all form part of the Olympic site plan, had been promised that that, should the bid go ahead, their boroughs would benefit from an almost magical transformation. 'London 2012 would be the key catalyst to the most significant urban and environmental regeneration ever seen in London' assures the bid's official site. In fact, London's Joint Planning Authorities Team (JPAT), responsible for overseeing the planning process, has just sent back part of the bid's application, on the grounds that there were 'sixty or seventy issues in the Environmental Statement which needed clarification', according to a JPAT spokesman. The meeting at Stratford Town Hall disclosed 'widespread unease and frustration' among local people. They are unlikely to be convinced by the finer details behind the official website's grand promises. Benefit no. 3 of staging the Olympics is, according to the website: 'Anecdotally, participation in sport has led to downturns in youth crime'. Leaving the 'anecdotally' aside, it is easy to wonder what kind of participation in sport, precisely. Watching the construction companies as they move in to turn Hackney Marshes - currently a thriving local football venue - into an Olympic coach park, perhaps. The fact that, as the website points out, the Olympics are proven to be 'a significant boost to the convention industry', is also unlikely to console residents whose homes are under threat, or the local businesses which will supposedly flourish despite being forced to close up and move elsewhere. But there are, certainly, parties who will benefit. The letters of support on the official website tellingly include those from Bechtel, Jarvis, the Bank of Japan and McDonalds. It is, however, the taxpayers who will supply most of the money to host the Games - just as in Athens, where the Games are currently thirty percent over budget, leaving the Greek taxpayers, who have already stumped up £3.3 billion, to find an extra £1.5 billion to support them. Other concerns with previous Olympics include the fact that in Los Angeles, Atlanta and Seoul, Korea, there was wholesale removal of homeless people and criminalising of poverty to make way for the businesses. In Atlanta, 8000 people were removed from the streets. Community and environmental groups are already making a noise over Vancouver's pursuit to host the 2010 Olympic Winter Games, with critics concerned about the lasting economic, environmental, political and social impacts of doing so. While currently, in New York, a determined coalition of residents and small business owners looks likely to succeed in blocking that city's bid for the 2012 Games. Unless London residents do the same, the way will then be left clear for London and Paris to fight it out between them. Bechtel and Jarvis, however, are certain to win; as are McDonalds, Visa, and CocaCola - just three of the Games' official sponsors. THE SPONSORS The International Olympic Committee’s global sponsorship program is known as TOP. According to Olympic marketing officials, a single four-year TOP sponsorship sells for $65 million or more. Never mind if the company involved is the antithesis of everything the Olympics are alleged to stand for - if it can afford it, it gets the deal. And when you're a 'Worldwide Olympic Partner' there are a lot of benefits to be had. These include:
Unsurprisingly, the TOP sponsorship programme enjoys one of the highest sponsorship renewal rates of any sports property. But if you're thinking about doing anything about all this then bear in mind Rule 61 of the Olympic Charter which states that 'No kind of demonstration or political, religious or racial propaganda is permitted in the Olympic areas.' In previous Games, the definition of 'Olympic Areas' has been extended to cover vast swathes of the host city. Visa
Atos Origin Coca Cola John Hancock Financial Services Kodak Panasonic Samsung Swatch General Electric |