Two recent reports in The Observer revealed that the Tory MP for Worcester, Peter Luff - in addition to being chairman of the Commons Select Committee on Agriculture - is also in the pay of Bell Pottinger, public relations adviser to US biotechnology giant Monsanto [2]. We sniffed a rat - one which looked like it might well have damaged organs and a depressed immune system[3]. Gillian Moody follows its trail.
According to the second report, several members of this committee - which is supposed to be 'policing' Government farming and food policy - were unaware of Luff's other job. Although he had included it in his Members' Interests, he had not announced it to his fellow committee members, and they would, accordingly, "call on Tuesday for a vote of no confidence in his chairmanship." But, curiously, there the story died.
There appeared to be a clear conflict of interest here, as Luff himself acknowledged: "In view of the controversial nature of Monsanto and the GM debate, I have concluded that I should have told you all sooner. I apologise to those of you who feel I was less than honest with you - this was not my intention." However, this rings rather hollow in view of the committee's report on Genetically Modified Organisms - a rather vapid one at that - which concluded that committee scrutiny of GM issues would, "serve as a useful reminder to Government of the need for transparency and informed debate on the issue."[4] It is hard to believe, in this context, that Luff's omission was a wholly innocent oversight.
“A Piece of Shit”
So, what had come of the reported call for a vote of no confidence? We phoned the committee, to follow up the story, only to receive the nonchalant reply, "How interesting," and an assertion that this aspect of the news report had been false. Lord Tim Bell of Bell Pottinger described the Observer story as, "a piece of shit journalism."[5]
We also asked him about his decision not to join the Association of Professional Political Consultants, a trade body set up to improve the image of lobbyists; his reasons, he impressed on us, were not at all because the APPC prohibits members from paying serving politicians - a practice which is illegal in the US[6].
Bell Pottinger is one of the UK's main private sector propaganda machines. Its parent company, Chime Communications has as its chairman Lord Tim Bell, controversial PR guru for Margaret Thatcher. He can also boast on his CV the following illustrious clients: South Africa's National Party; the Coal Board during the 1984 miners' strike; post-Dayton, Milosevic-led Yugoslavia; and, as well as Lady Thatcher herself, three other important figures in the Pergau dam affair - Malaysian Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohammed; Lord Weinstock, chief executive of GEC; and Tan Sri Armugam, head of GEC Malaysia [7].
If this doesn't put you off your GM food, Bell not only advised the pro-Pinochet presidential candidate Hernan Buchi in Chile's first elections since the coup of 1973, but also ran a £200,000 PR campaign in the UK for the General himself after his arrest [8]. For his services - for which he had already excessively rewarded himself financially[9] - Bell was knighted by Lady Thatcher and given a peerage by Tony Blair.
His moral integrity and compassion are well evidenced in these intelligent and candid comments: "Restrictions on the market are socialism and should therefore be resisted tooth and nail." And: "If you want to stamp out lobbying, it would be a bit like John Wolfendon and prostitution. He didn't stamp it out - he made it done behind closed doors. So probably the much more sensible route would be to try to make sure it is as open as possible."[10]
Misleading the Public
So, what need did Monsanto have of kerb-crawling? Clearly, they've had a PR problem in their attempts to push GMOs onto us, especially following their £1m, Bartle Bogle Hegarty-run ad campaign last year which ended up falling foul of the Advertising Standards Authority.
The ASA ruled that Monsanto had been "misleading", had expressed its own opinion "as accepted fact", and had claimed benefits of GM food which, "had not been fully assessed by regulatory bodies in the UK or the USA."[11]
Monsanto's public image is in a bad way. In February, the company was fined for failing to control properly an area of GM oil-seed rape[12]. In the same month, it was revealed that the company had funded the Rowett Research Institute to the tune of £140,000[13]. This is the same institute which suspended Dr. Arpad Pusztai after he claimed GM foods could be harmful. Monsanto had also received bad press for its overall corporate strategy of attempting to gain full control of the food chain by buying up other seed companies and ensnaring farmers into total dependence on Monsanto products: "We are aiming to consolidate the whole food chain," a Monsanto director told the Indian press[14]. As Christian Aid summarized the situation, "the new technology puts too much power over food into too few hands."[15]
Monsanto's aggressive expansion and marketing campaigns in Brazil and India have led to open conflict even with the governments of those nations, which clearly have more bottle than ours. Indian farmers were bombarded with flashy advertising, sales promotions and sponsorship of events, in the name of buying Monsanto's GM cotton seeds. Mark Wells, head of marketing in India, told a Guardian journalist to go visit Prof MS Swaminathan who, he said, is "balanced about GM."
But the professor was less than admiring of corporate ways: "Ah, Monsanto. It has so much money... They came to me but the damage had been done. I told them to give information, not PR. When they buy the big seed companies, it creates the suspicion that agriculture is becoming proprietory, that science is not in the public good. We are afraid of these large companies. Ethics is important. They must have a commitment to poverty alleviation, not profit alone."[16]
For us, in the UK, if it's information rather than PR that you want, don't bother visiting the London Science Museum's Future Food exhibition - it has been devised with the involvement of biotech nasty Zeneca, for whom, incidentally, Dr Richard Simpson, Labour MSP for Ochil, is a £5,000-a-year consultant. [17]
So, Monsanto will be seeking to come across better than telling us that they have "no need to guarantee the safety of genetically modified food products,"[18] which is, instead, a matter for government regulators. And they will most certainly not be reminding us that they brought us Agent Orange, PCBs and BST/BGH (bovine growth hormone). [19] When asked if Monsanto's PR situation was salvageable, "Very much, yes," was the reply of David Hill, former Labour party spokesman, now working for Bell Pottinger. [20]
The Mad Salvaging the Bad
The salvage operation has been taken up with zeal by our corporate-friendly Labour government (it seems that Monsanto may be getting their money's worth from Bell Pottinger.) According to a Downing Street spokesman, "The prime minister said it was extraordinary the extent to which the media... gave huge reports to anything which fed the hysteria [against GM foods]."[21]
But if there is anti-GM hysteria, it is more than matched by that of the pro-GM camp, who naively claim that the corporations' GM technology is well nigh a gift from God: that it is more environmentally friendly, and even that it will enable us to feed the starving.
These people would do well to read Christian Aid's report on the subject. However one wonders if the report could have any impact on those who take the view that we should test GM crops in the environment to see if they are safe enough to be released into the environment!
When faced with such state madness, its understandable how responsible citizens might feel that to commit criminal damage against a GM 'test' site is the only option.
Even God Hates GMOs
Recently the Agriculture Ministry's Central Science Laboratory requested that the Church Commissioners allow their land be used for GM trials.
The Commissioners' chairman is Stuart Bell, Labour MP for Middlesborough and also an employee of Bell Pottinger . [22] Not surprisingly, Bell was reported to have been deeply involved in this debate. [23] However, after the press picked up the story, the Commissioners' Ethical Investment Working Group decided to put off a decision until they had completed a full inquiry into the issues. The Rev Paul Cawthorne commended this timely application of the brakes, saying, "I'm pleased that the church has shown caution because expediting the commercialisation has led to a clouding of the moral issues."[24] Are Bell Pottinger flagging?
But God is dead, and we shall need more than theology to exorcise the lobbyists from government. We may hope, perhaps, that last year's 'Lobbygate' cash-for-access scandal will prompt the Neill (formerly Nolan) Committee on Standards in Public Life to call for statutory legislation over them.[25]
Footnotes
[1] The Guardian, 22.2.99, Analysis: It's business as usual, by Jean-Pierre Berlan and Richard C Lewontin.
[2] The Observer, 4.7.99, 11.7.99. Entry in Register of Members' Interests, 25.6.99: "Adviser on political affairs to Bell Pottinger Communications, providing advice only on new business and to named clients declared in section 3 below (direct continuation of my career with Lowe Bell before membership of the House). (£5,001-£10,000). Adviser to Bell Pottinger Consultants on corporate public relations, providing in particular advice on new business work for corporate, non-lobbying prospective clients (direct continuation of my career with Lowe Bell before membership of the House)."
[3] The Guardian, 18.5.99, Royal Society dismisses 'flawed' GM food research. Daily Telegraph, 10.6.99.
[4] Select Committee on Agriculture, Sixth Report, Genetically Modified Organisms, 8.6.99, (3). Our emphasis.
[5] Telephone conversation, 28.7.99.
[6] Ibid.; The Observer, 4.7.99.
[7] Financial Times, 25.4.94; ibd., 15.7.94; ibid., 29.7.96; ibid., 2.3.94, The Times, 26.2.94.
[8] Mark Hollingsworth, The Ultimate Spin Doctor: The Life & Fast Times of Tim Bell, London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1997, pp.264-5; Financial Times, 23.1.99.
[9] Annual salary of well over £_m (Chime Communications plc Annual Report 1998, p.42.)
[10] The Times, 11.3.95; ibid., 9.1.97.
[11] ASA Monthly Report, No. 99, 11.8.99, pp. 64-8. (http://www.asa.org.uk)
[12] BBC Online, 17.2.99.
[13] BBC Online, 14.2.99.
[14] Financial Times, 1.7.99, The seeds of dispute; ibid., 28.7.99, US soyabean market cornered; ibid., 28.7.99, Biotech companies stake out battleground. The Guardian, 19.7.99, The seeds of wrath.
[15] Christian Aid, 5.99, Selling Suicide: farming, false promises and genetic engineering in developing countries, on their website at http://www.christian-aid.org.uk.
[16] The Guardian, 19.7.99, The seeds of wrath.
[17] Economist 17.1.98, I'm modified, buy me: Marketing genetic engineering; Daily Telegraph, 7.7.99, Labour MSP works for GM food firm.
[18] The Guardian, 22.2.99.
[19] Monsanto, in Paula Kepos (ed.), International Directory of Company Histories, vol.9, Detroit, London & Washington: St James Press, 1994, pp.355-7.
[20] Financial Times, 23.2.99, Monsanto scores an own goal
[21] BBC Online, 27.5.99.
[22] Independent, 20.7.99; Register of Members' Interests, 25.6.99.
[23] Daily Express, 8.8.99, Church MP in GM row.
[24] Independent, 11.8.99, Church ban on GM crop trials.
[25] BBC Online, 5.7.99, Toughen lobby codes - Draper.